Muhammad Hanif Khan another northern British Pakistani sexual pervert has been jailed for 16 years after being found guilty of raping boys he was supposed to be teaching at a mosque.
Cue the silence in the British Pakistani community until of course their son or daughter is raped by one of their own sick sadistic religious leaders originating from Pakistan.
LM wrote about this scum previously however, I've also highlighted all manner of other sex cases involving British Pakistanis and much prefer to malign the country they all originate from rather than tarnish the beautiful faith of Islam by describing them as Muslim. Have a guess which country ranks number 1 in Google's searches for Porn and is aka Pornistan.
These are just a handful of cases involving northern British Pakistani's here and here however, what's equally ominous is the number of Pakistani Imams here and here whose sexual abuse of young British Pakistani kids is clearly on the rise.
Lord Ahmad may be on to something when he blames first cousin marriages that northern British Pakistanis seem to specialise in despite genetic defects for the enormous rise in sexual abuse cases arising in that community.
How odd that on this blog, no-one can be bothered to condemn this religious Muslim paedophile but I have just the most abusive insults against Shanna Bukhari who is not abusing anyone by readers of this blog. Shame on you all. It just seems the usual thing - much better and easier to condemn and try to control women...Thanks LM for reporting on this - there have been so many cases like this and communities just cover it up...
ReplyDelete"How odd that on this blog, no-one can be bothered to condemn this religious Muslim paedophile"
ReplyDelete-Not really, because no-one,Muslim or non-Muslim can/would defend his actions.Condemnation is therefore implicit.
However, that some Muslims seek to defend the ugly nature of SB does cause a reaction. Not rocket science is it?
"Pornistan" - What an irrational bigoted views LM's holds.
ReplyDeleteThe Google rating does not include all those who do have access to the internet including the female part of the population, or does LM think they are worthy of being counted as humans & citizens? The results could be skewed by a minority of lone nutters thus casting aspersions is like blaming all for the actions of a few. Is this fair? LM's analysis is childish, forget about unscientific.
Strange that LM does not compare northern Pakistanis with any other geographic or ethnic group including the aboriginal population. Did the recent breaking & arrest of a cyber kiddie porn cabal include northern Pakistanis out of proportion with their demographics? Why doesn't LM ever mention this, just character-assanitaing a whole group for hidden reasons?
"Lord Ahmad may be on to something when he blames first cousin marriages that northern British Pakistanis seem to specialise in despite genetic defects for the enormous rise in sexual abuse cases arising in that community."
This is a logical fallacy called a non-sequitur
written by irrational LM. Where is the proof for your unwarranted extrapolation LM? Is there a causal link between the frequency of genetic defects & sexual abuse? So according to that rationale, how would LM treat the Ummah & its marriage practice historically. Not a logical & decent way of thinking for someone who presumably claims to be a Muslim is it LM?
Because Pakistan being the only muslim Nuclear country in the world ...so it is obvious that bloody zeon organisations represents as most porn search is from Pakistan....so u call Pakistan is a Pornistan.....u just go to hell.....and don't delete my commnt mf...
ReplyDelete