The Daily Excrement owned by Jewish extremist Richard Desmond has invented the term "Harem" Muslims to describe a govt welfare crackdown on Polygamous marriages.
LM does not agree with Muslims being provided special exemptions and additional welfare benefits for spouses in Polygamous marriages however, the story is once again yet another example of a Jewish extremist owned Paper targeting Muslims while attempting to generate Islamophobia and hysteria towards Muslims in the process.
The story of course is wildly exaggerated as full fact accurately highlight however, the agenda of Jewish extremists like Richard Desmond continues with one notable change Edward Jeory, Desmonds Muslim attack dog is relatively silent. LM highlighted the pernicious nasty gutter journalism of the Israelite scum Jeory here here and here so Desmond appears to have reshuffled his Israelites and now Macer Hall seems to be sharing the anti Muslim burden on behalf of Desmond.
LM does not agree with Muslims being provided special exemptions and additional welfare benefits for spouses in Polygamous marriages however, the story is once again yet another example of a Jewish extremist owned Paper targeting Muslims while attempting to generate Islamophobia and hysteria towards Muslims in the process.
The story of course is wildly exaggerated as full fact accurately highlight however, the agenda of Jewish extremists like Richard Desmond continues with one notable change Edward Jeory, Desmonds Muslim attack dog is relatively silent. LM highlighted the pernicious nasty gutter journalism of the Israelite scum Jeory here here and here so Desmond appears to have reshuffled his Israelites and now Macer Hall seems to be sharing the anti Muslim burden on behalf of Desmond.
Oh I've read that everywhere not just that paper. What else would you call it, it is a harem, I suppose, although I believe those women were actually concubines, the posh word for unpaid prostitues.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it strange yet another law that muslims can break with impunity, but the british can't, they would get prosecuted for more than one wife, as it's bigamy.
Why am I not surprised.
ReplyDeleteSo much for secular Britain where a man can have dozens of mistresses, but two women are not allowed to choose to marry one man.
ReplyDelete^ Oohhh I think you are dreaming there, must men aren't that lucky!
ReplyDeleteAnyway you muslims wouldn't want to get around sexually would you, oh only if they're young girls, and white.
I don't see anything wrong with polygamous marriages, but then again I find gay marriages perfectly acceptable. I think marriage laws should be updated to recognise gay unions and put them on par with heterosexual marriages in terms of financial/social rights.
ReplyDeleteI'm also in favour of legalising polygamous marriages (1 man, more than 1 woman) the day they legalise polyandrous marriages (1 woman, more than 1 man).
"I think marriage laws should be updated to recognise gay unions and put them on par with heterosexual marriages in terms of financial/social rights."
ReplyDeleteI think you'll find that's already happened in britain, a civil ceremony gives them all those rights you mention.